I ask myself three questions. First: where is this going? A retail shelf, a warehouse rack, an iPhone home screen, a browser tab — each destination has different requirements. Second: who or what is reading it? A scanner needs quiet zones and minimum sizes. An iPhone needs specific dimensions and a solid background. Third: what happens if it fails? If the answer is a rejected shipment or a blank app icon, you need the type with the strictest validation.
Apple touch icon tool was built for exactly this scenario, and Apple's Safari Web Content Guide spells out the requirements it enforces. So the three questions mostly answer themselves.
Most people skip the first question, and it is the one that matters most. A label destined for a retail shelf has different constraints than one destined for an internal warehouse bin. Knowing the destination before you generate determines every other decision.
After a few production failures, I settled on a simple setup: generate with the correct type, keep the critical parameter enabled, and verify against the real reader before anything ships. It sounds obvious, but most people skip at least one of the three.
The critical parameter is easy to forget because it is invisible on screen. Apple touch icon tool keeps it enabled by default, and Apple's Safari Web Content Guide confirms it is required, so I cannot accidentally drop it.
I also keep a sample of every type I generate, so I can compare new output against something I know works. That reference set has caught regressions more times than I can count.
People search for a generator, pick the first result, type something in, and hit download. That is fine if you are making a one-off label for a personal project. It is a disaster if you are printing labels for a supply chain or deploying icons to a production website.
Every type exists for a reason. Apple's Safari Web Content Guide defines distinct use cases, and using the wrong type for your scenario is worse than using no type at all — because a wrong type that scans successfully gives you false confidence. I have seen shipments get rejected at receiving docks because someone used a generic format when the receiver required a registered one.
The cost of guessing wrong is rarely visible on the day you generate the file. It shows up weeks later, when a scanner refuses to read a label or an iPhone shows a blank square. That lag is why so many people make the same mistake once.
At the end of the day, the goal is an output you do not have to worry about. If a single step here saves you one redo, it was worth the read. I keep W3C Web App Manifest specification bookmarked for the days I doubt myself, and I run my checks on every export before it ships.